Micro-finance Access for Women Entrepreneurs in Makassar: A Phenomenological Study of Barriers and Survival Strategies

https://doi.org/10.59971/ijhabs.v3i2.750

Authors

  • Andi Mustika Amin Management Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

Keywords:

Microfinance, Women Entrepreneurs, Financial Inclusion, Phenomenology, Makassar

Abstract

This study examines how women entrepreneurs in Makassar negotiate access to and use of microfinance in a limited socio-economic environment, using a humanistic economic perspective to promote dignity, agency, and relational outcomes. Qualitative interviews reveal that while microcredit supplies the short—term liquidity essential for day-to-day operations, formal lending is constrained by collateral demands, procedural complexity, the gender asset gap, and time poverty-forces that drive many women toward informal lending, Diversified Income Strategies, and emerging digital channels. Evidence from digital finance and platform research suggests that successful FinTech adoption depends on trust, usability, security, and perceived value, which shape whether digital options complement or replace conventional microfinance in local contexts. Field experiments on online mentoring show that carefully designed digital interventions can increase women's willingness to engage with mentor networks, but effective connections require platform support and user learning that reduces onboarding friction and builds trust. Complementary policy tools-small matching grants, time-saving subsidies (eg, childcare), and targeted business advisors-have been shown to reduce information and time constraints, increase formal credit acceptance, and improve corporate performance among female entrepreneurs, especially those with prior experience. Together, these findings argue for an integrated policy package that streamlines formal lending, embeds relational support and capability development, and leverages trustworthy digital interfaces so that microfinance improves economic resilience and human dignity for women-led microenterprises in Makassar. 

References

Aristei, D., & Angori, G. (2021). Heterogeneity and state dependence in firms’ access to bank credit. Small Business Economics, 59(1), 47–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00545-x

Barker, A. M., Cristancho, S. M., Stalmeijer, R., Konopasky, A., & Varpio, L. (2025). A picture's worth a thousand words: Enhancing qualitative data collection with rich pictures. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70033

Belitski, M., Guenther, C., Kritikos, A., & Thurik, R. (2021). Economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on entrepreneurship and small businesses. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00544-y

Brickell, K., Picchioni, F., Natarajan, N., Guermond, V., Parsons, L., Zanello, G., & Bateman, M. (2020). Compounding crises of social reproduction: Microfinance, over-indebtedness and the COVID-19 pandemic. World Development, 136, 105087. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105087

Dueñas, A. N., Lazarus, M. D., & Byram, J. N. (2025). There is a method to the madness, and a madness to the method: A beginner's guide to qualitative research. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70055

Fu, J., & Krauss, A. (2023). Preparing fertile ground: How does the quality of business environments affect MSE growth? Small Business Economics, 63(1), 51–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00804-z

Gai, L., Arcuri, M., & Ielasi, F. (2023). How does government-backed finance affect SMEs’ crisis predictors? Small Business Economics, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00733-x

Hani, U., Wickramasinghe, A., Kattiyapornpong, U., & Sajib, S. (2022). The future of data-driven relationship innovation in the microfinance industry. Annals of Operations Research, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04943-6

Jourdan, Z., Corley, J., Valentine, R., & Tran, A. M. (2023). Fintech: A content analysis of the finance and information systems literature. Electronic Markets, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-023-00624-9

Lall, S., Chen, L., & Mason, D. (2022). Digital platforms and entrepreneurial support: A field experiment in online mentoring. Small Business Economics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00704-8

Meurer, M. M., Waldkirch, M., Schou, P., Bucher, E., & Burmeister-Lamp, K. (2021). Digital affordances: How entrepreneurs access support in online communities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Small Business Economics, 58(2), 637–663. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00540-2

Morris, M. H., Soleimanof, S., & Tucker, R. (2022). Drivers of fragility in the ventures of poverty entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 61(2), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00687-6

Nicolas, T. (2021). Short-term financial constraints and SMEs’ investment decision: Evidence from the working capital channel. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 1885–1914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00488-3

Srhoj, S., Škrinjarić, B., Radas, S., & Walde, J. (2021). Small matching grants for women entrepreneurs: Lessons from the past recession. Small Business Economics, 59(1), 117–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00524-2

Stephens, G., Ottrey, E., & Matthews, K. (2025). A practical guide to using diary methods in qualitative research. Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.70102

Published

2025-11-12

How to Cite

Amin, A. M. (2025). Micro-finance Access for Women Entrepreneurs in Makassar: A Phenomenological Study of Barriers and Survival Strategies. International Journal of Humanity Advance, Business & Sciences (IJHABS), 3(2), 369–376. https://doi.org/10.59971/ijhabs.v3i2.750

Issue

Section

Articles