Legal Analysis of Law Enforcement In The Fraud Case At Bank Jago

https://doi.org/10.59971/jumper.v2i3.347

Authors

  • Raihan Muhammad Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Amirul Makhfud Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Bintang Rafli Ananta Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Muhammad Rizqi Robbani Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Fauzuld Nur Arsy Legal Studies, Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Keywords:

Legal Analysis, Banking Fraud, Law Enforcement

Abstract

This research analyzes a fraud case at Bank Jago involving the embezzlement of customer funds worth Rp1.3 billion by a former bank employee in 2023. This case is of concern because it reveals weaknesses in the internal monitoring system and the risk of abuse of authority. Using a normative legal approach and qualitative descriptive methods, this research examines the chronology of events, the perpetrator's modus operandi, and the effectiveness of applicable regulations. Research data was obtained from secondary sources such as official reports, statutory regulations, internal bank policies, and scientific articles. The research results show that weak internal supervision and unauthorized access are the main causes of fraud. The perpetrators used their authority to illegally unblock customer accounts and transfer funds to their personal accounts, which violates the ITE Law, Fund Transfer and TPPU. This research highlights the importance of applying advanced technology such as artificial intelligence and big data analytics to detect potential fraud, synergy between banking institutions and law enforcement officials, as well as employee training to build an antifraud culture. With these recommendations, it is hoped that research can contribute to improving the integrity and security of the banking sector in Indonesia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Djailani, Mohammad Fadil. 2024. “Bank Jago Dibobol Oknum Pegawai, Kepercayaan Nasabah Terancam?” Suara.Com. Retrieved December 12, 2024 (https://www.suara.com/bisnis/2024/07/16/144658/bank-jago-dibobol-oknum-pegawai-kepercayaan-nasabah-terancam).

Fadilah, Kurniawan. 2024. “Terbongkar Siasat Eks Pegawai Bank Jago Bobol Rekening Rp 1,3 Miliar.” Detiknews. Retrieved December 12, 2024 (https://news.detik.com/berita/d-7433201/terbongkar-siasat-eks-pegawai-bank-jago-bobol-rekening-rp-1-3-miliar).

Mumpuni, Ayu. 2024. “Cara Mantan Karyawan Bank Jago Bobol Rekening Senilai Rp 1,3 M.” Tirto.Id. Retrieved December 11, 2024 (https://tirto.id/cara-mantan-karyawan-bank-jago-bobol-rekening-senilai-rp13-m-g1u4).

Wanda, Alifin Nurahmana. 2020. “Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Perbankan Terkait Dengan Informasi Kerahasiaan Bank.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law 2(1):1–14. doi: 10.31960/ijocl.v2i1.299.

Wicaksono, Adhi. 2024. “Bank Jago Buka Suara Terkait Eks Karyawan Bobol Rekening Nasabah.” CNN Indonesia. Retrieved December 11, 2024 (https://www.cnnindonesia.com/ekonomi/20240710170329-78-1119762/bank-jago-buka-suara-terkait-eks-karyawan-bobol-rekening-nasabah).

Arifin, R. 2018. LAW ENFORCEMENT IN BANKING CRIMINAL ACT INVOLVING INSIDERS. Jambe Law Journal, 1(1), 55–90. https://doi.org/10.22437/home.v1i1.7.

Efendi, J., & Rijadi, P. 2022. Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris: Edisi Kedua. Prenada Media.

Kristanti, O., Kuntadi, C., & Pramukty, R. 2023. FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI EFEKTIVITAS SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERNAL: PERAN AUDIT INTERNAL, KARAKTERISTIK AUDITOR INTERNAL, DAN KUALITAS AUDIT INTERNAL. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(8), 2899–2911. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i8.1304.

Lestari, M. D., & Geraldina, I. 2023. Analisis Determinan Banking Fraud: Perspektif Crowe’s Pentagon Fraud Theory (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Sektor Perbankan yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2014-2018). Jurnal Keuangan aan Perbankan, 16(2), 51. https://doi.org/10.35384/jkp.v16i2.312.

Muhammad, R. (2024). The Urgency of The Regulation of Legislative Power During The ‘Lame Duck’Session to Optimize Constitutionalism. Journal of Constitutional and Governance Studies, 1(1), 38-61.

Oktafian, I. 2024, July 11. Modus Pencurian Uang Nasabah Bank Jago, Pelaku Buka 112 Rekening yang Terblokir. BeritaSatu.com. Retrieved from https://www.beritasatu.com/dki-jakarta/2827987/modus-pencurian-uang-nasabah-bank-jago-pelaku-buka-112-rekening-yang-terblokir.

Daniel, et al. “Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Keamanan dan Perlindungan Nasabah atau Konsumen dalam Layanan Bank Digital.” ejournal.warunayama.org, Nov. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v1i4.819.

Wicaksana, Dika Hikmah, et al. “Analisis Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pembobolan Rekening Bank Digital Yang Dilakukan Pegawai Bank (Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perbankan Berdasarkan Studi Kasus Bank Jago 2023).” Wicaksana | Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14220517.

Surya Ningrum, Delvyan Putri. “ANALISA YURIDIS DALAM KASUS KEJAHATAN SIBER TERHADAP INTERNET BANKING DI INDONESIA.” Journal Evidence of Law 1, no. 1. 2022, https://doi.org/10.59066/jel.v1i1.472

Suari, K. R. A., & Sarjana, I. M. (2023). Menjaga Privasi di Era Digital: Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 6(1), 132-142. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v6i1.4484

Latumahina, RE, 2014, “Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Data Pribadi Di Dunia Maya”, Jurnal Gema Aktualia, Vol.3, No. 2, Hal. 14-25.

Published

2024-12-16

How to Cite

Muhammad, R., Makhfud, A., Ananta, B. R., Robbani, M. R., & Arsy, F. N. (2024). Legal Analysis of Law Enforcement In The Fraud Case At Bank Jago. Journal Management & Economics Review (JUMPER), 2(3), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.59971/jumper.v2i3.347

Issue

Section

Articles